Wednesday, January 21, 2009

"Hey Victor"

“This is What it Means to say Phoenix, Arizona” is a short story by Sherman Alexie. Alexie’s story was adapted into film in 1998 as Smoke Signals which was directed by Chris Eyre. The plotlines and themes between the story and the movie are very similar. Among many themes family, culture, and friendship dominate this story about two Indians named Victor and Thomas Builds-the-Fire.

Along with the common themes there are also many visible similarities between the story and the movie. One important similarity between the story and the movie is that Victors father is not around long. Victor in both instances of his story grows up with no male influence in his life. The absence of the father in the movie is important because it maintains the same storyline as in the story. Another similarity that is important is the presence of the character Thomas Builds-the-Fire. Thomas is an acquaintance of Victors; he is a strange and unique person who ultimately shows Victor in both the movie and the story what friendship and brotherhood are truly all about.

There are also visible differences between the movie and the story as well. It is important to note that these differences kept the theme and message of the story intact, unlike the differences in “Memento Mori” and Memento which put a new radical spin on the story itself. At the beginning of the movie we are shown exactly how Victor and Thomas’ paths cross in the scene with the burning house. In the story we know that the two Indians grew up together but we do not know the circumstances in which they grew up together, the movie provides us with the tragic circumstance that involves both families. In the movie we learn that Thomas’ parents die in a tragic house fire that is accidentally caused by Victor’s father while he was in a drunken stupor. These facts contribute to the storyline and provide answers to some questions that remained unanswered in the book. In the book we don’t know why this strange Indian Thomas is the way he is, “strange”. The movie implies that he is a good man but he grew up with his grandmother and essentially became a “grandma’s boy”, he had no mother or father to raise him. This fact may contribute to Thomas’ awkwardness. The movie also implies that Victors father became an alcoholic after he caused the horrible fire that killed Thomas’ parents. The guilt and alcoholism ultimately caused the fathers departure from his family to Phoenix Arizona.

The story uses flashbacks to tell the stories of the “then young” Victor and Thomas. The movie does this similarly in a very effective technique of its own. The flashbacks in the movie are essentially occurring in Victor’s memory as he travels to Phoenix to claim his father. One scene in particular demonstrated this well as “grown up Victor” looks out the window of the bus as “young Victor” runs beside it after beating up “young Thomas.” The movies way of demonstrating flashbacks was very well done and not confusing and complex as they were in Memento.

One may argue that Smoke Signals is a great film because it holds true to the powerful main themes of the story which were family, brotherhood, and culture. Victor has no “blood brother” however Thomas is the closest thing he has to it. In both instances Thomas gives his money to Victor and travels with him to claim Victor’s dead father, a trip that should never be taken on alone by anybody. In both the story and the movie Indians call one another “cousin” and the occupation of “story teller” is mentioned in both cases which illustrates Native American culture. Families, despite atrocities that they may have previously committed are still in fact family. This notion is shown in both the story and the movie because Victor goes on the pilgrimage to claim the dead father that he never truly knew. The ending scene of the movie where Victor simply breaks down while scattering his father’s ashes into the Spokane River best illustrates this sense of family. The similarity in the themes between the story and the movie make Smoke Signals a powerful and thought provoking movie.

7 comments:

  1. I liked the description of the flashbacks in paragraph 4, using the film technique (the cut away shots) to illustrate what Victor was going through psychologically.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The comparrison and contrast of the short story and the movie flows very well. I, also, like the last paragraph's description about the flashbacks.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how the post mentioned that the movie and story had the same theme. Usually the movies that stick with the same theme or plot as the book are the most successful.
    Bobby P.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree that the viewing the movie helped clarify the motive's of the characters, especially Victor's father. I would also agree that the flashbacks used in "Smoke Signals" were far less confusing than in "Memento".

    ReplyDelete
  5. I definitely agree with both Bobby and Sam. I could totally see the movie in my head while I was reading the short story even though I had never seen the movie before. Also, "Memento" was way more mind boggling than "smoke Signals"
    But great job Kyle, I think you summed up the similarities and differences very well

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am glad you highlighted the difference between the introduction to Thomas and Arnold's relationship in the book and the movie, because it was one that i also immediately picked up on.
    While the story leaves us inquisitive of Thomas' motives and kind actions, the film illustrates the reason for Thomas' reverence towards Arnold at its inception. this allows for the viewer to see the conflicting views the two main characters hold, easing their separate evaluations. doing this provides us the opportunity to form our own opinions and ideas of victor and thomas as well as arnold with a slight peek at their characteristics, and ways of thinking.


    Albert Williams

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree that the flash backs in this movie were alot easier understood than in memento. Good writing

    ReplyDelete